|
HISTORY
OF THE TRIPLE BOARD PROGRAM
By
Dr. Abe Bartell
Approximately
twenty years ago it became evident that two major problems existed in
the field of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. First, there was an
enormous shortage of Child & Adolescent Psychiatrists. Secondly,
there was a perceived disconnect and strain between Child &
Adolescent Psychiatry and Pediatrics. Most notably, fewer
Pediatricians were seeking Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
training, and it appeared that fewer Pediatricians were referring to
Child & Adolescent Psychiatrists. The former was significant
because the origins of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry lie in the
post-World War II Pediatric community. In an Editor’s Note
(1989) describing the inception of the TBP, Dr. John Schowalter
described that the Committee on Certification in Child Psychiatry
(CCCP) was interested in capturing the students interested in both
the medical and psychological disorders of childhood.
There
were many solutions considered to address these issues and the
Combined Residency in Pediatrics-General Psychiatry-Child and
Adolescent Psychiatry ("“Triple Board”) was one of
them. The “Triple Board” concept was to create an
alternative pathway of training to become a Child & Adolescent
Psychiatrist that would combine Pediatric, General Psychiatry and
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry training and would allow a path
less than that required in the conventional training sequence of
seven or eight years. One of the goals of the combined training
program was to create a nucleus of academically based Child &
Adolescent Psychiatrists that were trained and socialized as
pediatricians who could bridge a gap between the Pediatric and the
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry communities. Additionally, it was
hoped that this core of “Triple Boarders” could serve as
a magnet in the academic environment to attract medical students to
the specialty field of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.
The
goal was to develop a combined program in Pediatrics, General
Psychiatry, and Child & Adolescent Psychiatry in five years that
combined 24 months of Pediatrics, 18 months of General Psychiatry,
and 18 months of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry training. Upon
completion of Triple Board Training graduates would be eligible to
sit for the Board Certification examinations offered by all three
disciplines.
From
32 initial applications from institutions, six were chosen to be
sites of a TBP Program (Einstein, Brown, Mount Sinai, Tufts,
Kentucky, Utah). On July 1, 1986, the first group of residents
started in the new Triple Board Program. (The reader is directed to
“An Experiment in Graduate Medical Education, Schowalter et
al., 2002 for a review of the development of the TBP.)
The
initial interest in, commitment to, and oversight of the TBP was
impressive. The Pediatrics-Psychiatry Joint Training Committee
(PPJTC) was comprised of representatives from the Committee on
Certification in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (Dr. Schowalter),
the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) (Drs. Benton and Stockman),
the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology (ABPN) (Drs. Scheiber
and Miller), the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) (Dr.
Daeschner), American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
(AACAP) (Dr. Enzer), and the American Psychiatric Association (APA)
(Dr. Scully). Additionally, there was a NIMH representative (Dr.
Haas) and a professional educator (Dr. Friedman). Funding was
provided from the NIMH, Center for Mental Health Services, ABP, and
ABPN for the PPJTC to prospectively administer and assess the
program.
The
initial six programs had vigorous oversight by all the above
components. There were annual site visits with all the residents, and
the Training Directors and summary site reports were generated.
(Residents took the Myers-Briggs Personality Test as part of their
participation.) Each program was regularly site visited, and there
were annual resident retreats and meetings. Medical students who
interviewed at TB Programs, but did not choose that residency, were
sought for feedback as to why they had decided not to choose the
combined option. This close "monitoring" and "ownership"
was beneficial, and the programs thrived. (See Schowalter et al.,
2002 for a review of the prospective evaluative process.)
Ultimately, the experiment was considered a success, and in 1995
(when the fifth and last cohort of pilot project residents completed
training) the combined program was voted in as a permanent residency.
The pilot program was the first of its kind to prospectively study
the efficacy and appropriateness of a new training program. The
results of the 10-year pilot project were so clear and convincing
that the programs were fully accredited in year eight of the pilot,
two years early!
The Future of
Triple Board Programs
By Dr. Doug Gray
Triple
board programs were initially designed as a way to draw medical
students into the field of child and adolescent psychiatry,
especially those who were struggling between the choices of
pediatrics, or child psychiatry. Pilot programs began in 1986, and
currently there are ten triple board programs.
At
first glance, a medical student looking at the triple board might
assume this would be a way to keep career options open. They could
graduate, and practice either pediatrics, or psychiatry, or spend
some time in each area. While this might be the case for some
applicants, this goal is too limiting and misses the full potential
of the training. Triple board residents can have remarkable careers
in areas that require use of all of the skills gained in the program.
For example, graduates are perfectly trained to work in large
university or children’s hospitals doing consultation-liaison
work. Their training allows them to communicate well with both the
pediatric and psychiatric staff, and they are well suited to work
between the two groups. There are also diagnostic areas, such as
eating disorders, that require several skill sets. Some triple board
graduates work with anorexic patients, first on the pediatric unit,
working with nursing staff and managing the patient’s acute
medical needs, then later working with the psychiatric team when the
patient is transferred to an inpatient psychiatric unit, and then to
the outpatient team. One doctor oversees the care throughout the
continuum, vastly improving patient care. Triple board graduates run
clinics taking care of patients with chronic medical illness, where
psychosocial problems are effecting compliance and causing acute
hospitalizations. Some triple board graduates share clinics with
neurologists, seeing kids with central nervous system problems, such
as head injuries, and they manage subsequent psychiatric problems.
Current triple board residents are exploring new avenues, such as
development of combination pediatrics and psychiatry clinics for
children in foster care, where their emotional and medical needs can
be met in one clinic. Combining current funding sources for these
children under one roof, can lead to an integrative model. The
triple board graduate is truly the “ultimate developmental
specialist,” with training on both mental and physical aspects
of child development.
Unfortunately,
many medical students have never heard of the triple board, and it
will be important to educate students regarding the opportunity to
integrate physical and mental health care for children, especially
when the medical student is drawn to both areas of study. Dr. Thomas
Anders, MD, the incoming president of the American Academy of Child
and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) has made a commitment to support
the Triple Board Programs, and to increase knowledge and awareness
about these programs. Dr. Anders recognizes that the national
shortage of child and adolescent psychiatrists must be addressed in a
number of ways, including the development of new “Portals”
into the field, and the growth and expansion of the Triple Board
Programs. To address this issue, in 2005, he created a position for
a Triple Board Training Director as Co-Chair of the Training and
Education Workgroup, for AACAP. The first effort in the education
process will be the development of a National Triple Board website.
From there, potential applicants will be able to access information
regarding Triple Board training, as well as websites from each
individual program. Once the national website is up, efforts will be
made to provide links to the Triple Board website, on other national
websites visited by medical students, residents, and attendings who
are invested in either pediatrics or child psychiatry. In addition,
efforts will be made to contact training directors for both
pediatrics and psychiatry at their national meetings, and to educate
them about Triple Board Training.
The
triple board model has been successful and we expect to see new
programs in the future. Several national leaders in the field of
child psychiatry are looking at how expansion should proceed. This
may involve the recruitment of universities who might be well suited
to start triple board programs, the availability of national
consultants to help them with planning, and the support of new
programs by both pediatrics and psychiatry. While there are many
excellent programs in the Northeast, expansion is needed to areas
such as California, where there are many metropolitan universities
which could support a triple board program.
A
friend who is an experienced family doctor once told me that half of
the patients he sees in his office are coming for emotional support,
and have vague symptoms. Of the half that has physical findings
(i.e. wheezing, high blood pressure), many of those are not compliant
with their treatment because of emotional issues. This leaves 25% of
the patients who caught strep throat, broke their hand, etc.
Unfortunately for primary care doctors, they get very limited
training in psychiatry. Referring patients to a separate clinic for
mental health needs is very difficult, and often the patients don’t
show up. For these reasons we need an integrative model for physical
and mental health, and for pediatric patients, triple board graduates
will lead the way.
|
|